|
|
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
EUROPEAN THORIUM CYCLE PROJECT SITE unrestricted access area |
ExtraNet | ||||||||||||||
|
|
[ExtraNet - Main] > [Thorium Cycle Project - Main] > [Objectives] Objectives European Thorium Cycle ProjectThe general objectives of this proposal are:The EU’s Fifth Framework Programme aims at the exploitation of the potential of nuclear energy by making nuclear technology safer and more economical. The aspect of sustainability is strongly emphasised in its full scope addressing environmental compatibility, social acceptance, waste management, disposal and non-proliferation aspects, protection of plant personnel, energy supply diversity, competitiveness etc. Against this background, the exploration of innovative concepts should also contribute to the general programme objectives including conservation and advancement of relevant know-how and its transfer to a new generation of nuclear engineers. New applications of nuclear power are indicated in complementary market segments beyond dedicated electricity production like co-generation of heat and power and incineration of long-lived radionuclides. The objective of this proposal work is to provide key data for the thorium cycle in the context of limitation of nuclear waste production and prospects for waste burning. The aim is to obtain essential data for the thorium fuel cycle. This project addresses one of the key items in the Work programme 2.3. Safety and efficiency of future systems. The previous 4th FWP Thorium cycle project has shown that there are important advantages of thorium cycles with respect to the waste issue. Long-lived radiotoxicity of mining waste is expected to be relatively small, which leads to more manageable waste compared to the uranium case. Fabrication of Th fuels is comparable with MOX fabrication methods as long as fresh Th, U and recycled Pu are used. However, recycling of U requires remote handling as well as innovative reprocessing techniques on industrial scale. Open cycles are possible in PWRs, but require additional fissile material, also known as make-up fuel or topping material. To reduce the radiotoxicity of PWR waste, make-up fuel like 233U or highly-enriched uranium should be admixed with Th. Advantages are observed during the first 10,000 years of storage. The long-term risk of directly stored fuel in a thorium matrix is not known very well yet, but there are speculations on improved performance. Further experimental work is needed to clarify this issue. Recycling gives a further reduction of radiotoxicity up to 10,000-50,000 years of storage. Th-assisted Pu burning in a PWR is an attractive option with respect to mass reduction of Pu, which could be twice that of U/Pu MOX in a 100% core loading. In open cycles, a relatively small amount of 233U is produced. Recycling of 233U together with Pu is feasible in a PWR. Fast reactors and accelerator-driven systems (ADS), like the Fast Energy Amplifier (FEA), offer the possibility of a closed Th cycle without additional fissile material, reducing mining needs and risks. Full recycling of actinides gives impressively low radiotoxicity results. Initially, these systems could be used for Th-assisted Pu-burning and simultaneous 233U breeding, providing fuel for a new generation of low- actinide-waste producing energy systems. Long-term residual risks of mining waste are reduced by storing in a geological disposal facility. Direct storage of Th-based fuels gives similar residual risks as U-based fuels with the present conservative assumptions. Long-term radiotoxicity of mining waste is smaller than for the U/Pu cycle in case of fast reactors and ADS. The reactor waste radiotoxicity is smallest if fast reactors or ADS are used with full actinide recycling. Pu burning capacity is high for once-through Th/Pu MOX in PWRs and in fast reactors or ADS. The general objective of this proposal is to supply key data for application of the Th-cycle in PWRs, FRs and ADS, with respect to Pu and TRU burning as well as reduction of lifetime of nuclear waste. The use of the thorium cycle offers a challenging option for waste reduction, both at the front and at the back-end of the fuel cycle. The front end of the Th fuel cycle, i.e. the mining of thorium, produces less waste than uranium mining. At the back of the thorium cycle, less waste is produced than with the conventional uranium cycle. In addition, very high plutonium consumption rates can be achieved when Th/Pu fuel is used. The specific objectives of this proposal are:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
NRG, PO Box 25, NL-1755 ZG Petten, Netherlands, Tel +31-224564950, Fax +31-224568912 Information about NRG: info@nrg.eu Update 30 May 2002 | |||||||||||||||